forked from MapComplete/MapComplete
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			109 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			6.2 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			109 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			6.2 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Analysis a reviews on Mangrove.reviews
 | |
| 
 | |
| MapComplete has - for some thematic maps - the ability to leave a review on an entity with Mangrove.Reviews..
 | |
| Up till now, I had no idea how much this feature was used. However, due to technical reasons I had another look to the reviews module and discovered the ['download all'-option](https://api.mangrove.reviews/reviews) on [mangrove.reviews](https://mangrove.reviews)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Mangrove Clients
 | |
| 
 | |
| The analysis was made with data from 20 january 2023, downloaded around 17:00 UTC time.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This data contained 660 reviews. As the website making the review is recorded, we can make a breakdown of the top websites:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - https://mangrove.reviews is unsuprisingly the most popular website to make reviews on, with 318 reviews made
 | |
| - MapComplete is the second (and the biggest 'external' website), with 192 reviews (of which 13 are made with the development version)
 | |
| - toggenburg.swiss is third, with 35 reviews
 | |
| 
 | |
| A variety of smaller websites follows, each with a few reviews made. At first glance, most of them seem to be swiss or german.
 | |
| Furthermore, there are 5 reviews made by `localhost:1234` and 7 by `localhost:5000`. The former is probably me, testing the creation of reviews while developing.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The full table is listed below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | Client website                         | Number of reviews |
 | |
| |----------------------------------------|-------------------|
 | |
| | https://mangrove.reviews               | 318               |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be             | 179               |
 | |
| | https://toggenburg.swiss               | 35                |
 | |
| | https://thurgau-bodensee.ch            | 29                |
 | |
| | https://pietervdvn.github.io           | 13                |
 | |
| | https://open-reviews.orderingstack.com | 13                |
 | |
| | https://heidiland.com                  | 12                |
 | |
| | https://open-reviews.net               | 12                |
 | |
| | https://winterthur.com                 | 9                 |
 | |
| | https://ostschweiz.ch                  | 7                 |
 | |
| | https://localhost:5000                 | 7                 |
 | |
| | https://actuallyfoods.com              | 5                 |
 | |
| | https://staging.mangrove.reviews       | 5                 |
 | |
| | https://localhost:1234                 | 5                 |
 | |
| | https://examples.twblue.cms.tso.ch     | 3                 |
 | |
| | https://ivydog.art (has NSFW content)  | 2                 |
 | |
| | https://toggenburg-aktiv.ch            | 1                 |
 | |
| | https://modernmount.blogspot.com       | 1                 |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Themes
 | |
| 
 | |
| It seems that pet owners gave reviews the most. The 'pets'-theme - first known as the 'dog' theme - yielded 35 reviews in total (if summed).
 | |
| The 'Pin je Punt'-campagin by Visit Flanders (which included pubs and cafés) is a close second with 29 reviews, followed by the shops theme.
 | |
| 
 | |
| While it might be surprising that the pets-theme has such a high number of reviews, the reason for this is straight-forward:
 | |
| the review-module is placed on top of the infobox for vets, whereas most other layers do have the images block there.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| | Theme                                                                                | Review count |
 | |
| |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/pets (incl 14 reviews made under the previous name 'dog') | 35           |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/toerisme_vlaanderen                                       | 29           |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/shops                                                     | 28           |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/food                                                      | 18           |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/playgrounds                                               | 16           |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/cafes_and_pubs                                            | 14           |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/personal                                                  | 14           |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/campersite                                                | 9            |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/sport_pitches                                             | 9            |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/fritures                                                  | 8            |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/climbing                                                  | 7            |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/onwheels                                                  | 3            |
 | |
| | https://mapcomplete.osm.be/hackerspaces                                              | 1            |
 | |
| | lgbtmap (theme on a fork)                                                            | 1            |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Language
 | |
| 
 | |
| At last, due to the full client URL being saved, we also know what language the user interface was in when the review was made:
 | |
| 
 | |
| | language | count |
 | |
| |----------|-------|
 | |
| | en       | 77    | 
 | |
| | nl       | 37    | 
 | |
| | de       | 27    | 
 | |
| | ru       | 13    | 
 | |
| | fr       | 9     | 
 | |
| | da       | 6     | 
 | |
| | es       | 2     |
 | |
| | unkown   | 21    | 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Locations
 | |
| 
 | |
| And as map makers, a quick geolocation-analysis can't miss as well.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Unsurprisingly, most of the reviews are in Europe:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| When zooming in, a clear cluster in Switzerland and Flanders is visible:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| When keeping only the Reviews made with MapComplete, the cluster in Flanders remains:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| (Copyright: pins are Mangrove Reviews, background map is OpenStreetMap of course)
 | |
| 
 | |
| # Conclusions
 | |
| 
 | |
| So, no big conclusions and surprises in this little analysis.
 | |
| The reviews are being used - but not very much, especially in comparison with the image-upload feature.
 | |
| Placing the reviews higher up might help or including in into the questions flow.
 | |
| The core question is how important reviews are within the vision of MapComplete.
 | |
| 
 | |
| As usual, data is available online [here](https://github.com/pietervdvn/MapComplete-data/blob/main/reviewsAnalysis), script is [here](./scripts/generateReviewsAnalysis.ts)
 |