Improve error messages

This commit is contained in:
Pieter Vander Vennet 2022-06-09 16:50:53 +02:00
parent adcdf4f18a
commit b9cc56bbc5
5 changed files with 43 additions and 36 deletions

View file

@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ export class TagUtils {
private static TagUnsafe(json: AndOrTagConfigJson | string, context: string = ""): TagsFilter {
if (json === undefined) {
throw `Error while parsing a tag: 'json' is undefined in ${context}. Make sure all the tags are defined and at least one tag is present in a complex expression`
throw new Error(`Error while parsing a tag: 'json' is undefined in ${context}. Make sure all the tags are defined and at least one tag is present in a complex expression`)
}
if (typeof (json) != "string") {
if (json.and !== undefined && json.or !== undefined) {
@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ export class TagUtils {
}
const withRegex = TagUtils.parseRegexOperator(tag)
if(withRegex != null) {
if (withRegex != null) {
if (withRegex.value === "*" && withRegex.invert) {
throw `Don't use 'key!~*' - use 'key=' instead (empty string as value (in the tag ${tag} while parsing ${context})`
}
@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ export class TagUtils {
}
return new RegexTag(
withRegex.key,
new RegExp("^"+value+"$", "s"+withRegex.modifier),
new RegExp("^" + value + "$", "s" + withRegex.modifier),
withRegex.invert
);
}
@ -468,26 +468,26 @@ export class TagUtils {
* TagUtils.ContainsOppositeTags([new Tag("key", "value"), new RegexTag("key", "value", true)]) // => true
* TagUtils.ContainsOppositeTags([new Tag("key", "value"), new RegexTag("key", /value/, true)]) // => true
*/
public static ContainsOppositeTags(tags: (TagsFilter)[]) : boolean{
for (let i = 0; i < tags.length; i++){
public static ContainsOppositeTags(tags: (TagsFilter)[]): boolean {
for (let i = 0; i < tags.length; i++) {
const tag = tags[i];
if(!(tag instanceof Tag || tag instanceof RegexTag)){
if (!(tag instanceof Tag || tag instanceof RegexTag)) {
continue
}
for (let j = i + 1; j < tags.length; j++){
for (let j = i + 1; j < tags.length; j++) {
const guard = tags[j];
if(!(guard instanceof Tag || guard instanceof RegexTag)){
if (!(guard instanceof Tag || guard instanceof RegexTag)) {
continue
}
if(guard.key !== tag.key) {
if (guard.key !== tag.key) {
// Different keys: they can _never_ be opposites
continue
}
if((guard.value["source"] ?? guard.value) !== (tag.value["source"] ?? tag.value)){
if ((guard.value["source"] ?? guard.value) !== (tag.value["source"] ?? tag.value)) {
// different values: the can _never_ be opposites
continue
}
if( (guard["invert"] ?? false) !== (tag["invert"] ?? false) ) {
if ((guard["invert"] ?? false) !== (tag["invert"] ?? false)) {
// The 'invert' flags are opposite, the key and value is the same for both
// This means we have found opposite tags!
return true
@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ export class TagUtils {
*
* TagUtils.removeShadowedElementsFrom([new Tag("key","value")], [new Tag("key","value"), new Tag("other_key","value")]) // => [new Tag("other_key","value")]
*/
public static removeShadowedElementsFrom(blacklist: TagsFilter[], listToFilter: TagsFilter[] ) : TagsFilter[] {
public static removeShadowedElementsFrom(blacklist: TagsFilter[], listToFilter: TagsFilter[]): TagsFilter[] {
return listToFilter.filter(tf => !blacklist.some(guard => guard.shadows(tf)))
}
@ -514,16 +514,16 @@ export class TagUtils {
*
* TagUtils.removeEquivalents([new RegexTag("key", /^..*$/), new Tag("key","value")]) // => [new Tag("key", "value")]
*/
public static removeEquivalents( listToFilter: (Tag | RegexTag)[]) : TagsFilter[] {
public static removeEquivalents(listToFilter: (Tag | RegexTag)[]): TagsFilter[] {
const result: TagsFilter[] = []
outer: for (let i = 0; i < listToFilter.length; i++){
outer: for (let i = 0; i < listToFilter.length; i++) {
const tag = listToFilter[i];
for (let j = 0; j < listToFilter.length; j++){
if(i === j){
for (let j = 0; j < listToFilter.length; j++) {
if (i === j) {
continue
}
const guard = listToFilter[j];
if(guard.shadows(tag)) {
if (guard.shadows(tag)) {
// the guard 'kills' the tag: we continue the outer loop without adding the tag
continue outer;
}
@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ export class TagUtils {
* TagUtils.containsEquivalents([new Tag("key","value")], [ new Tag("other_key","value")]) // => false
* TagUtils.containsEquivalents([new Tag("key","value")], [ new Tag("key","other_value")]) // => false
*/
public static containsEquivalents( guards: TagsFilter[], listToFilter: TagsFilter[] ) : boolean {
public static containsEquivalents(guards: TagsFilter[], listToFilter: TagsFilter[]): boolean {
return listToFilter.some(tf => guards.some(guard => guard.shadows(tf)))
}

View file

@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ export class Fuse<T> extends DesugaringStep<T> {
break;
}
}catch(e){
console.error("Step "+step.name+" failed due to "+e);
console.error("Step "+step.name+" failed due to ",e,e.stack);
throw e
}
}

View file

@ -321,8 +321,9 @@ export class DetectShadowedMappings extends DesugaringStep<QuestionableTagRender
for (const calculatedTagName of this._calculatedTagNames) {
defaultProperties[calculatedTagName] = "some_calculated_tag_value_for_"+calculatedTagName
}
const parsedConditions = json.mappings.map(m => {
const ifTags = TagUtils.Tag(m.if);
const parsedConditions = json.mappings.map((m,i) => {
const ctx = `${context}.mappings[${i}]`
const ifTags = TagUtils.Tag(m.if, ctx);
if(m.hideInAnswer !== undefined && m.hideInAnswer !== false && m.hideInAnswer !== true){
let conditionTags = TagUtils.Tag( m.hideInAnswer)
// Merge the condition too!
@ -407,7 +408,7 @@ export class DetectMappingsWithImages extends DesugaringStep<TagRenderingConfigJ
const mapping = json.mappings[i]
const ignore = mapping["#"]?.indexOf(ignoreToken) >=0
const images = Utils.Dedup(Translations.T(mapping.then).ExtractImages())
const images = Utils.Dedup(Translations.T(mapping.then)?.ExtractImages() ?? [])
const ctx = `${context}.mappings[${i}]`
if (images.length > 0) {
if(!ignore){

View file

@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ export interface LayerConfigJson {
*/
tagRenderings?:
(string
| { builtin: string, override: any }
| { builtin: string | string[], override: any }
| QuestionableTagRenderingConfigJson
| RewritableConfigJson<(string | { builtin: string, override: any } | QuestionableTagRenderingConfigJson)[]>
) [],

View file

@ -172,15 +172,21 @@ export default class TagRenderingConfig {
this.mappings = json.mappings.map((mapping, i) => {
const ctx = `${translationKey}.mappings.${i}`
if (mapping.if === undefined) {
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: "if" is not defined in ${JSON.stringify(mapping)}`
}
if (mapping.then === undefined) {
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: if without body`
if(mapping["render"] !== undefined){
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: no 'then'-clause found. You might have typed 'render' instead of 'then', change it in ${JSON.stringify(mapping)}`
}
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: no 'then'-clause found in ${JSON.stringify(mapping)}`
}
if (mapping.ifnot !== undefined && !this.multiAnswer) {
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: ifnot defined, but the tagrendering is not a multianswer`
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: 'ifnot' is defined, but the tagrendering is not a multianswer. Either remove ifnot or set 'multiAnswer:true' to enable checkboxes instead of radiobuttons`
}
if (mapping.if === undefined) {
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: "if" is not defined, but the tagrendering is not a multianswer`
if(mapping["render"] !== undefined){
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: a 'render'-key is present, this is probably a bug: ${JSON.stringify(mapping)}`
}
if (typeof mapping.if !== "string" && mapping.if["length"] !== undefined) {
throw `${ctx}: Invalid mapping: "if" is defined as an array. Use {"and": <your conditions>} or {"or": <your conditions>} instead`