elgaard/MapComplete
1
0
Fork 0
forked from MapComplete/MapComplete
Code Pull requests Activity

Refactoring: use theme instead of layout in a lot of places

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Pieter Vander Vennet 2024-10-17 04:06:03 +02:00
parent 9427083939
commit bdc9ba52a6
104 changed files with 445 additions and 449 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

20
src/Logic/MetaTagging.ts
View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { ExtraFuncParams, ExtraFunctions, ExtraFuncType } from "./ExtraFunctions
import LayerConfig from "../Models/ThemeConfig/LayerConfig"
import { Feature } from "geojson"
import FeaturePropertiesStore from "./FeatureSource/Actors/FeaturePropertiesStore"
import LayoutConfig from "../Models/ThemeConfig/LayoutConfig"
import ThemeConfig from "../Models/ThemeConfig/ThemeConfig"
import { GeoIndexedStoreForLayer } from "./FeatureSource/Actors/GeoIndexedStore"
import { IndexedFeatureSource } from "./FeatureSource/FeatureSource"
import OsmObjectDownloader from "./Osm/OsmObjectDownloader"
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
>()
private state: {
readonly selectedElement: Store<Feature>
readonly layout: LayoutConfig
readonly theme: ThemeConfig
readonly osmObjectDownloader: OsmObjectDownloader
readonly perLayer: ReadonlyMap<string, GeoIndexedStoreForLayer>
readonly indexedFeatures: IndexedFeatureSource
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
constructor(state: {
readonly selectedElement: Store<Feature>
readonly layout: LayoutConfig
readonly theme: ThemeConfig
readonly osmObjectDownloader: OsmObjectDownloader
readonly perLayer: ReadonlyMap<string, GeoIndexedStoreForLayer>
readonly indexedFeatures: IndexedFeatureSource
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
}) {
this.state = state
const params = (this.params = MetaTagging.createExtraFuncParams(state))
for (const layer of state.layout.layers) {
for (const layer of state.theme.layers) {
if (layer.source === null) {
continue
}
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
features,
params,
layer,
state.layout,
state.theme,
state.osmObjectDownloader,
state.featureProperties
)
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
return
}
const state = this.state
const layer = state.layout.getMatchingLayer(feature.properties)
const layer = state.theme.getMatchingLayer(feature.properties)
if (!layer) {
return
}
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
[feature],
this.params,
layer,
state.layout,
state.theme,
state.osmObjectDownloader,
state.featureProperties,
{
@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
features: Feature[],
params: ExtraFuncParams,
layer: LayerConfig,
layout: LayoutConfig,
theme: ThemeConfig,
osmObjectDownloader: OsmObjectDownloader,
featurePropertiesStores?: FeaturePropertiesStore,
options?: {
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
// The calculated functions - per layer - which add the new keys
// Calculated functions are defined by the layer
const layerFuncs = this.createRetaggingFunc(layer, ExtraFunctions.constructHelpers(params))
const state: MetataggingState = { layout, osmObjectDownloader }
const state: MetataggingState = { theme: theme, osmObjectDownloader }
let atLeastOneFeatureChanged = false
let strictlyEvaluated = 0
@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ export default class MetaTagging {
}
}
if (!window.location.pathname.endsWith("theme.html")) {
if (!Utils.runningFromConsole && !window.location.pathname.endsWith("theme.html")) {
console.warn(
"Static MetataggingObject for theme is not set; using `new Function` (aka `eval`) to get calculated tags. This might trip up the CSP"
)