forked from MapComplete/MapComplete
		
	Add some documentation on the differences between SC an MC, close #257
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									824c64acf6
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						8564a1a5b0
					
				
					 1 changed files with 59 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										59
									
								
								Docs/MapComplete_vs_other_editors.md
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										59
									
								
								Docs/MapComplete_vs_other_editors.md
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							| 
						 | 
					@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					# MapComplete versus other editors
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					**StreetCo**mplete + **MapCo**ntrib = MapComplete
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					## StreetComplete
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					StreetComplete might look pretty similar to MapComplete at first glance - especially as it was a huge inspiration. However, there are a few huge differences between the two, especially in vision.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					### Vision
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					The core philosophy of StreetComplete is **OpenStreetMap is cool! Help to improve it by answering these questions**
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					The core philosophy of MapComplete is **Here is a map of topic XYZ - enjoy it and update it if there is still some info missing**
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					This means that StreetComplete is mainly aimed towards people who are already OpenStreetMap-enthusiasts, whereas mapcomplete is aimed to an audience interested in a certain topic.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Of course, the next step is to attempt to inform that audience why having an open map is so cool and that they can contribute as well.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					### Use cases
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					StreetComplete is to help mappers quickly gather some data on fixed topics
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					MapComplete is made to
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					- show the OSM-data in great detail for a specific theme about XYZ
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					- help mappers quickly add data for this theme if they are passing by
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					- be embedded in other websites
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					- Allow the addition of new themes
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					### Technology
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					StreetComplete is an android app, so can only be used on Android Phones
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					MapComplete is a web-app, and thus works on all devices. It can be installed as PWA to give an 'app-like'-experience, but can just as well be embedded in other websites.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					### Feature comparison
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					MapComplete is also an OpenStreetMap-viewer, while StreetComplete hides known values.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					MapComplete will not work offline.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					In MapComplete it is easier to add more experimental, extremely detailed and more personal styles, as each topic is separated with its own part.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					MapComplete is a bit more complex to use - both because one needs to go hunting for a specific map style rather than getting bunch of quests by default and is likely to ask far more detailed question (email address and phone number of bicycle shop etc). 
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					After all if it would duplicate StreetComplete it would be a bit pointless and it is pretty hard to compete with SC by being easier to use and more newbie friendly, while there is space for "more complicated/detailed/involved editor working like SC".
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Also, MapComplete has no requirement to make question easy to answer, making both possible to ask more questions than StreetComplete but making it more complicated to use.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					No support for splitting ways in MapComplete (as of now - hopefully it'll get added one day).
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					MapComplete allows the addition of new points, whereas StreetComplete does not.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					## MapContrib
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					MapContrib is another very similar editor which served as inspiration. MapContrib offers - just like MapComplete - an extensible, thematic map view. However, I never understood the MapContrib user interface.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					MapContrib also allows to add new points and to edit tags - but it is very cumbersome.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Note that the use case of MapContrib is much closer to MapComplete
 | 
				
			||||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue