Move some assets to the 'tagRenderings'-directory as they are only needed there, add 'smoking' question, add 'nightclubs' to 'pub_cafe'-layer

This commit is contained in:
Pieter Vander Vennet 2022-06-20 01:42:30 +02:00
parent 2a6a09da76
commit e13c7ae677
18 changed files with 472 additions and 132 deletions

View file

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ import {QuestionableTagRenderingConfigJson} from "../Json/QuestionableTagRenderi
class ValidateLanguageCompleteness extends DesugaringStep<any> {
private readonly _languages: string[];
constructor(...languages: string[]) {
@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ class ValidateTheme extends DesugaringStep<LayoutConfigJson> {
continue
}
if (image.match(/[a-z]*/)) {
if(Svg.All[image + ".svg"] !== undefined){
if (Svg.All[image + ".svg"] !== undefined) {
// This is a builtin img, e.g. 'checkmark' or 'crosshair'
continue;// =>
}
@ -121,18 +121,18 @@ class ValidateTheme extends DesugaringStep<LayoutConfigJson> {
` Width = ${width} height = ${height}`;
(json.hideFromOverview ? warnings : errors).push(e)
}
const w = parseInt(width);
const h = parseInt(height)
if(w < 370 || h < 370){
const e : string = [
if (w < 370 || h < 370) {
const e: string = [
`the icon for theme ${json.id} is too small. Please rescale the icon at ${json.icon}`,
`Even though an SVG is 'infinitely scaleable', the icon should be dimensioned bigger. One of the build steps of the theme does convert the image to a PNG (to serve as PWA-icon) and having a small dimension will cause blurry images.`,
` Width = ${width} height = ${height}; we recommend a size of at least 500px * 500px and to use a square aspect ratio.`,
].join("\n");
].join("\n");
(json.hideFromOverview ? warnings : errors).push(e)
}
})
} catch (e) {
console.error("Could not read " + json.icon + " due to " + e)
@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ export class ValidateThemeAndLayers extends Fuse<LayoutConfigJson> {
constructor(knownImagePaths: Set<string>, path: string, isBuiltin: boolean, sharedTagRenderings: Map<string, any>) {
super("Validates a theme and the contained layers",
new ValidateTheme(knownImagePaths, path, isBuiltin, sharedTagRenderings),
new On("layers", new Each(new ValidateLayer(undefined, false)))
new On("layers", new Each(new ValidateLayer(undefined, false, knownImagePaths)))
);
}
}
@ -222,22 +222,22 @@ class OverrideShadowingCheck extends DesugaringStep<LayoutConfigJson> {
}
class MiscThemeChecks extends DesugaringStep<LayoutConfigJson>{
class MiscThemeChecks extends DesugaringStep<LayoutConfigJson> {
constructor() {
super("Miscelleanous checks on the theme", [],"MiscThemesChecks");
super("Miscelleanous checks on the theme", [], "MiscThemesChecks");
}
convert(json: LayoutConfigJson, context: string): { result: LayoutConfigJson; errors?: string[]; warnings?: string[]; information?: string[] } {
const warnings = []
const errors = []
if(json.id !== "personal" && (json.layers === undefined || json.layers.length === 0)){
errors.push("The theme "+json.id+" has no 'layers' defined ("+context+")")
if (json.id !== "personal" && (json.layers === undefined || json.layers.length === 0)) {
errors.push("The theme " + json.id + " has no 'layers' defined (" + context + ")")
}
if(json.socialImage === ""){
warnings.push("Social image for theme "+json.id+" is the emtpy string")
if (json.socialImage === "") {
warnings.push("Social image for theme " + json.id + " is the emtpy string")
}
return {
result :json,
result: json,
warnings,
errors
};
@ -258,28 +258,29 @@ export class PrevalidateTheme extends Fuse<LayoutConfigJson> {
export class DetectShadowedMappings extends DesugaringStep<QuestionableTagRenderingConfigJson> {
private readonly _calculatedTagNames: string[];
constructor(layerConfig?: LayerConfigJson) {
super("Checks that the mappings don't shadow each other", [], "DetectShadowedMappings");
this._calculatedTagNames = DetectShadowedMappings.extractCalculatedTagNames(layerConfig);
}
/**
*
*
* DetectShadowedMappings.extractCalculatedTagNames({calculatedTags: ["_abc:=js()"]}) // => ["_abc"]
* DetectShadowedMappings.extractCalculatedTagNames({calculatedTags: ["_abc=js()"]}) // => ["_abc"]
*/
private static extractCalculatedTagNames(layerConfig?: LayerConfigJson | {calculatedTags : string []}){
private static extractCalculatedTagNames(layerConfig?: LayerConfigJson | { calculatedTags: string [] }) {
return layerConfig?.calculatedTags?.map(ct => {
if(ct.indexOf(':=') >= 0){
if (ct.indexOf(':=') >= 0) {
return ct.split(':=')[0]
}
return ct.split("=")[0]
}) ?? []
}
/**
*
*
* // should detect a simple shadowed mapping
* const tr = {mappings: [
* {
@ -319,20 +320,20 @@ export class DetectShadowedMappings extends DesugaringStep<QuestionableTagRender
}
const defaultProperties = {}
for (const calculatedTagName of this._calculatedTagNames) {
defaultProperties[calculatedTagName] = "some_calculated_tag_value_for_"+calculatedTagName
defaultProperties[calculatedTagName] = "some_calculated_tag_value_for_" + calculatedTagName
}
const parsedConditions = json.mappings.map((m,i) => {
const parsedConditions = json.mappings.map((m, i) => {
const ctx = `${context}.mappings[${i}]`
const ifTags = TagUtils.Tag(m.if, ctx);
if(m.hideInAnswer !== undefined && m.hideInAnswer !== false && m.hideInAnswer !== true){
let conditionTags = TagUtils.Tag( m.hideInAnswer)
if (m.hideInAnswer !== undefined && m.hideInAnswer !== false && m.hideInAnswer !== true) {
let conditionTags = TagUtils.Tag(m.hideInAnswer)
// Merge the condition too!
return new And([conditionTags, ifTags])
}
return ifTags
})
for (let i = 0; i < json.mappings.length; i++) {
if(!parsedConditions[i].isUsableAsAnswer()){
if (!parsedConditions[i].isUsableAsAnswer()) {
// There is no straightforward way to convert this mapping.if into a properties-object, so we simply skip this one
// Yes, it might be shadowed, but running this check is to difficult right now
continue
@ -372,8 +373,10 @@ export class DetectShadowedMappings extends DesugaringStep<QuestionableTagRender
}
export class DetectMappingsWithImages extends DesugaringStep<TagRenderingConfigJson> {
constructor() {
private knownImagePaths: Set<string>;
constructor(knownImagePaths: Set<string>) {
super("Checks that 'then'clauses in mappings don't have images, but use 'icon' instead", [], "DetectMappingsWithImages");
this.knownImagePaths = knownImagePaths;
}
/**
@ -407,21 +410,29 @@ export class DetectMappingsWithImages extends DesugaringStep<TagRenderingConfigJ
for (let i = 0; i < json.mappings.length; i++) {
const mapping = json.mappings[i]
const ignore = mapping["#"]?.indexOf(ignoreToken) >=0
const ignore = mapping["#"]?.indexOf(ignoreToken) >= 0
const images = Utils.Dedup(Translations.T(mapping.then)?.ExtractImages() ?? [])
const ctx = `${context}.mappings[${i}]`
if (images.length > 0) {
if(!ignore){
if (!ignore) {
errors.push(`${ctx}: A mapping has an image in the 'then'-clause. Remove the image there and use \`"icon": <your-image>\` instead. The images found are ${images.join(", ")}. (This check can be turned of by adding "#": "${ignoreToken}" in the mapping, but this is discouraged`)
}else{
} else {
information.push(`${ctx}: Ignored image ${images.join(", ")} in 'then'-clause of a mapping as this check has been disabled`)
for (const image of images) {
if (this.knownImagePaths !== undefined && !this.knownImagePaths.has(image)) {
const ctx = context === undefined ? "" : ` in a layer defined in the theme ${context}`
errors.push(`Image with path ${image} not found or not attributed; it is used in ${json.id}${ctx}`)
}
}
}
}else if (ignore){
} else if (ignore) {
warnings.push(`${ctx}: unused '${ignoreToken}' - please remove this`)
}
}
return {
return {
errors,
warnings,
information,
@ -431,10 +442,10 @@ export class DetectMappingsWithImages extends DesugaringStep<TagRenderingConfigJ
}
export class ValidateTagRenderings extends Fuse<TagRenderingConfigJson> {
constructor(layerConfig: LayerConfigJson) {
constructor(layerConfig?: LayerConfigJson, knownImagePaths?: Set<string>) {
super("Various validation on tagRenderingConfigs",
new DetectShadowedMappings( layerConfig),
new DetectMappingsWithImages()
new DetectShadowedMappings(layerConfig),
new DetectMappingsWithImages(knownImagePaths)
);
}
}
@ -446,11 +457,13 @@ export class ValidateLayer extends DesugaringStep<LayerConfigJson> {
*/
private readonly _path?: string;
private readonly _isBuiltin: boolean;
private knownImagePaths: Set<string>;
constructor(path: string, isBuiltin: boolean) {
constructor(path: string, isBuiltin: boolean, knownImagePaths: Set<string>) {
super("Doesn't change anything, but emits warnings and errors", [], "ValidateLayer");
this._path = path;
this._isBuiltin = isBuiltin;
this.knownImagePaths = knownImagePaths
}
convert(json: LayerConfigJson, context: string): { result: LayerConfigJson; errors: string[]; warnings?: string[], information?: string[] } {
@ -475,13 +488,13 @@ export class ValidateLayer extends DesugaringStep<LayerConfigJson> {
{
// duplicate ids in tagrenderings check
const duplicates = Utils.Dedup(Utils.Dupiclates( Utils.NoNull((json.tagRenderings ?? []).map(tr => tr["id"]))))
.filter(dupl => dupl !== "questions")
if(duplicates.length > 0){
errors.push("At "+context+": some tagrenderings have a duplicate id: "+duplicates.join(", "))
const duplicates = Utils.Dedup(Utils.Dupiclates(Utils.NoNull((json.tagRenderings ?? []).map(tr => tr["id"]))))
.filter(dupl => dupl !== "questions")
if (duplicates.length > 0) {
errors.push("At " + context + ": some tagrenderings have a duplicate id: " + duplicates.join(", "))
}
}
try {
{
// Some checks for legacy elements
@ -538,10 +551,10 @@ export class ValidateLayer extends DesugaringStep<LayerConfigJson> {
}
}
if (json.tagRenderings !== undefined) {
const r = new On("tagRenderings", new Each(new ValidateTagRenderings(json))).convert(json, context)
warnings.push(...(r.warnings??[]))
errors.push(...(r.errors??[]))
information.push(...(r.information??[]))
const r = new On("tagRenderings", new Each(new ValidateTagRenderings(json, this.knownImagePaths))).convert(json, context)
warnings.push(...(r.warnings ?? []))
errors.push(...(r.errors ?? []))
information.push(...(r.information ?? []))
}
if (json.presets !== undefined) {